GMO: Seeds murderers false advertising and PR black - not political lafaire - electronic edition [vegasslider id = "22511" delay = "4500" fade = "1500" overlay = "http://demo.jamesdbruner.com/wp-content/uploads /2012/12/az_subtle.png "]
This page is having a slideshow that uses Javascript. Your browser either does not support Javascript or you have it turned off. To see this page as it is meant to appear please use a Javascript enabled browser.
| Posted on 20/05/2014
Besides lobbying and sponsorship at all levels lafaire in the policy of Monsanto and other producers of GMOs also includes lies, unfair advertising and denial of the negative results from the independent studies and research. Thanks to skillful propaganda conducted mass distribution of genetically modified organisms is realized lafaire in the short term.
Promises lafaire by the producers of GMOs focused in several key areas - solving problems with feeding the population in developing countries and the world as a whole, reducing the cost of agricultural production and reduce pollution of agricultural land with chemicals. What does the practice and what is reality after more than two decades mass deployment of transgenic crops.
1. The main pretext of the producers of GMOs is the possibility of their implementation to feed the ever-increasing population of the earth. This statement is promoted more than 60 years with the launch of the "Green lafaire Revolution." If these allegations are true, the yields of GM seeds sown areas will be higher and this will be achieved with less cost for growing plants. It was promised to farmers. Analysis lafaire of the results of the previous use of GMOs not confirm such a hypothesis. (...)
In 2009, Scientific lafaire American and the Union of Concerned lafaire Scientists (Union of Concerned Scientists - UCS) defended the same thesis. A report on UCS analyzes of more than 20 academic lafaire research on two major crops subject to genetic engineering in the US - wheat and soybeans. Citing the results of these studies UCS argues that transgenic wheat and soy do not increase yields. (...)
The results over the last 15 years show that the increase in income from agricultural production is not due to the application of GMOs and hybrid selection, which for millennia has always been the traditional way for the development of plant genetics. Despite all the action so far and the massive introduction of GMO food problems are aggravated inequality in the world is increasing lafaire at a much faster pace in recent decades. In fact, problems with food come from excessive use of chemicals in production lafaire and the uneven distribution of production. Definitely can say that the introduction of GMOs increases yields. This proved to be false advertising.
2. The creators of GMOs have also argued that the introduction of transgenic crops reduces the cost of production and that will benefit both farmers and consumers. Is this the case? What are the facts. lafaire
Just one year the retail price for "Roundup" has risen from $ 32 per gallon in December 2006 to $ 45 per gallon. In June 2008, it is now $ 75 per gallon. This is a jump of 134 percent in less than two years. For the same period, the average price of soy, the best-selling GM crops in the US has risen by more than 50% - from 32.30 dollars lafaire to 49.23 dollars per acre. In July 2008, Monsanto announced that it plans to raise average prices for some types of genetically modified corn on the company lafaire by 35%. What is done with corn is made with other GM crops. The average price of soy, the best-selling GM crops in the US has risen by more than 50% in just two years - from 2006 to 2008 - from 32.30 dollars to 49.23 dollars per acre. Such a pricing policy is held against other major GM crops. (...)
Vicious practice of patenting seeds from private corporations leads to enslavement of small and medium agricultural business. Those who do not want to fall under the power of patented seeds, they can not keep their products free of pollination with transgenic crops because they are in the neighborhood. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) also warns that transgenic technology "can be expected job creation. This will affect fundamentals in agriculture and will have a decisive role in the future of the poorest. "
3. Another highly publicized promise of transgenic producers was a significant reduction in pesticide use in GM compared to conventional crops. Practice and refuted this claim. It turns out that transgenic plants require more herbicides than conventional. According to USDA and EPA rapid deployment of
This page is having a slideshow that uses Javascript. Your browser either does not support Javascript or you have it turned off. To see this page as it is meant to appear please use a Javascript enabled browser.
| Posted on 20/05/2014
Besides lobbying and sponsorship at all levels lafaire in the policy of Monsanto and other producers of GMOs also includes lies, unfair advertising and denial of the negative results from the independent studies and research. Thanks to skillful propaganda conducted mass distribution of genetically modified organisms is realized lafaire in the short term.
Promises lafaire by the producers of GMOs focused in several key areas - solving problems with feeding the population in developing countries and the world as a whole, reducing the cost of agricultural production and reduce pollution of agricultural land with chemicals. What does the practice and what is reality after more than two decades mass deployment of transgenic crops.
1. The main pretext of the producers of GMOs is the possibility of their implementation to feed the ever-increasing population of the earth. This statement is promoted more than 60 years with the launch of the "Green lafaire Revolution." If these allegations are true, the yields of GM seeds sown areas will be higher and this will be achieved with less cost for growing plants. It was promised to farmers. Analysis lafaire of the results of the previous use of GMOs not confirm such a hypothesis. (...)
In 2009, Scientific lafaire American and the Union of Concerned lafaire Scientists (Union of Concerned Scientists - UCS) defended the same thesis. A report on UCS analyzes of more than 20 academic lafaire research on two major crops subject to genetic engineering in the US - wheat and soybeans. Citing the results of these studies UCS argues that transgenic wheat and soy do not increase yields. (...)
The results over the last 15 years show that the increase in income from agricultural production is not due to the application of GMOs and hybrid selection, which for millennia has always been the traditional way for the development of plant genetics. Despite all the action so far and the massive introduction of GMO food problems are aggravated inequality in the world is increasing lafaire at a much faster pace in recent decades. In fact, problems with food come from excessive use of chemicals in production lafaire and the uneven distribution of production. Definitely can say that the introduction of GMOs increases yields. This proved to be false advertising.
2. The creators of GMOs have also argued that the introduction of transgenic crops reduces the cost of production and that will benefit both farmers and consumers. Is this the case? What are the facts. lafaire
Just one year the retail price for "Roundup" has risen from $ 32 per gallon in December 2006 to $ 45 per gallon. In June 2008, it is now $ 75 per gallon. This is a jump of 134 percent in less than two years. For the same period, the average price of soy, the best-selling GM crops in the US has risen by more than 50% - from 32.30 dollars lafaire to 49.23 dollars per acre. In July 2008, Monsanto announced that it plans to raise average prices for some types of genetically modified corn on the company lafaire by 35%. What is done with corn is made with other GM crops. The average price of soy, the best-selling GM crops in the US has risen by more than 50% in just two years - from 2006 to 2008 - from 32.30 dollars to 49.23 dollars per acre. Such a pricing policy is held against other major GM crops. (...)
Vicious practice of patenting seeds from private corporations leads to enslavement of small and medium agricultural business. Those who do not want to fall under the power of patented seeds, they can not keep their products free of pollination with transgenic crops because they are in the neighborhood. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) also warns that transgenic technology "can be expected job creation. This will affect fundamentals in agriculture and will have a decisive role in the future of the poorest. "
3. Another highly publicized promise of transgenic producers was a significant reduction in pesticide use in GM compared to conventional crops. Practice and refuted this claim. It turns out that transgenic plants require more herbicides than conventional. According to USDA and EPA rapid deployment of
No comments:
Post a Comment