This site contains a detailed description of the components of the SENS strategy. These approaches

Reminder Hsn"s project - "Engineering strategies for making negligible rate of aging" led by Dr. Aubrey de Grey Mkmbrig'- is one of the leading research projects aimed at finding aging radical measures to extend life. Compared to conventional academic institutions, the project combines "ordinary people" - students and volunteers in research, advocacy and fundraising.
So here it is:
SENS is a detailed plan for curing human aging process. SENS is an engineering project, as medicine is a branch of engineering. The main idea behind the SENS is to realize usfoods login that you can see the whole aging process of gradual changes in the body, the molecular and cellular usfoods login level, which are a byproduct of the essential processes of metabolism. A good way to think about these changes as accumulation of damage it causes gradual destruction usfoods login of the body's systems.
The traditional approach to gerontology usfoods login (Gerontology) usfoods login extend life, is slowing down the accumulation of damage above. This misguided strategy. Firstly, because it requires that we better understand biological processes. Secondly, aiming aimed at slowing down the aging process and make it.
Alternative to the more short-term, is the geriatric approach: treat old, while the accumulated damage to the body at the cellular and molecular levels is increasing. This is a losing usfoods login battle because the damage accumulated in advance makes the inevitable diseases.
This site contains a detailed description of the components of the SENS strategy. These approaches is likely to be applicable in mice over the next decade (assuming adequate funding), and will be applied in humans a decade or two later. Much information (both for professionals and the general public) are in the database.
I'm working on curing aging and I think you should too you because I believe usfoods login that saving lives is in fact the highest anyone could give him his time, and because more than 100,000 usfoods login people die every day for reasons that young people will never die from them, you will save more lives in helping to cure aging than any other method. (True, some people can make a significant change than others, but do not underestimate the difference that you can do: First, check here and think what else I did not mention, usfoods login you can do.)
If the time you finish reading this page will not convince that aging can be cured, I urge you to contact me and give reasons for the lack of consent. So convinced, also send me an email - we can work together to make the best of your abilities (including enhancement or adding arguments presented on this page). Significance of non-contact from you is that you think it's okay not to work on curing aging and it also okay not to be able to or not wanting to why it's okay to say why. forget it.
3) arguments as to why it is important not cure aging
There are two types of answers to objections against aging therapy based on the possible social consequences. The first is to examine each of the reservations depth and detailed how to build an argument avoids the scenario in question. I think this is a valuable approach; I myself have adopted it here and later in this paper and many others have done so as well, often even better than me. But I also have a more general answer, usfoods login among other things, avoids objections to the form: "Well, yes, this strategy, but what if it fails". More precisely, note, people - we're talking about a life here, living 100,000 per day. What are you doing right now if you are bored? Suicide? I figured that. Enterprises have always been problems and no doubt will always have problems, and it is working to resolve them just as technological problems. Pretending that we can not deal with the problems waiting for us in the future, it would be better for us to discuss the infinite number of the poor life expectancy of millions of ancestors is a sick joke anyway but even more sick when we realize how much it would be unlikely such problems will be worse or more difficult to solve than those already encountered in the past. It's not like we've been able to solve past problems seem less daunting. For example, what would have believed in 1850 that the company would agree to disrespect absurdity of wearing rubber accessory at a time who will hold our relationship sex, only to stop the population explosion usfoods login came as a result usfoods login of the almost complete extinction of the death of infants? And yet, that is exactly usfoods login what he had read in the industrialized world without compulsion except the simple fact that children who are still alive are very expensive.
Perhaps you expect me to offer a solution so that the company should "probably" adopt. In fact, I do not do it. I have two answers did not say anything about what the specific steps the company to take, proactive measures regarding one past and the other deals with human rights. Then I will describe some of the issues related to those solutions that we may select and may question some concerns, but do not forget I'm not saying what I think the company did do. Put yourself in someone with power - for example, the Prime Minister of France - in 1870 when Pasteur turned around and claimed hygiene can virtually usfoods login eliminate infection or death of infants at birth. Your position, you have a certain influence how quickly this knowledge will be distributed on - and therefore, how quickly life will start to be saved. But you realize that human beings will start to act according to the same principles and wash their hands, etc., so the population explosion will start faster because of those children who do not die. What would you do? You were worried about informing the people as quickly usfoods login as possible or keep the information to yourself as you can to inhibit the Population Problem? I'm still waiting to meet the man who says he would keep the information to himself. In this respect, there is no difference with aging therapy. usfoods login No. Yes, obviously there would be some of the population explosion, just like after which mortality was avoided - and we might respond that reducing fertility faster as we did in the past or we need more time - but the first priority is to end the slaughter. Everything else is details. Apparently the earth's population will grow faster immediately after the treatments will become available and we are a